lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] zram: Introduce an aged idle interface
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:43:36PM -0700, Brian Geffon wrote:
> This change introduces an aged idle interface to the existing
> idle sysfs file for zram.
>
> When CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING is enabled the idle file
> now also accepts an integer argument. This integer is the
> age (in seconds) of pages to mark as idle. The idle file
> still supports 'all' as it always has. This new approach
> allows for much more control over which pages get marked
> as idle.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Correct unused variable warning when
> CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING is not enabled.
> v1 -> v2:
> - Switch to using existing idle file.
> - Dont compare ktime directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst | 8 +++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 60 +++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> index 700329d25f57..8c8a92e5c00c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> @@ -328,6 +328,14 @@ as idle::
> From now on, any pages on zram are idle pages. The idle mark
> will be removed until someone requests access of the block.
> IOW, unless there is access request, those pages are still idle pages.
> +Additionally, when CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING is enabled pages can be
> +marked as idle based on how long (in seconds) it's been since they were
> +last accessed, in seconds::
> +
> + echo 86400 > /sys/block/zramX/idle
> +
> +In this example all pages which haven't been accessed in more than 86400
> +seconds (one day) will be marked idle.
>
> Admin can request writeback of those idle pages at right timing via::
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index fcaf2750f68f..2af5cdb8da1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -291,22 +291,16 @@ static ssize_t mem_used_max_store(struct device *dev,
> return len;
> }
>
> -static ssize_t idle_store(struct device *dev,
> - struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> +/*
> + * Mark all pages which are older than or equal to cutoff as IDLE.
> + * Callers should hold the zram init lock in read mode
> + **/
> +static void mark_idle(struct zram *zram, ktime_t cutoff)
> {
> - struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> + int is_idle = 1;
> unsigned long nr_pages = zram->disksize >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int index;
>
> - if (!sysfs_streq(buf, "all"))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> - if (!init_done(zram)) {
> - up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> for (index = 0; index < nr_pages; index++) {
> /*
> * Do not mark ZRAM_UNDER_WB slot as ZRAM_IDLE to close race.
> @@ -314,14 +308,48 @@ static ssize_t idle_store(struct device *dev,
> */
> zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
> if (zram_allocated(zram, index) &&
> - !zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_UNDER_WB))
> - zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE);
> + !zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_UNDER_WB)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING
> + is_idle = (!cutoff || ktime_after(cutoff, zram->table[index].ac_time));
> +#endif
> + if (is_idle)
> + zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE);
> + }
> zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
> }
> +}
>
> - up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> +static ssize_t idle_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> + ktime_t cutoff_time = 0;
> + ssize_t rv = -EINVAL;
>
> - return len;
> + if (!sysfs_streq(buf, "all")) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING
> + u64 age_sec;
> + /* If it did not parse as 'all' try to treat it as an integer */
> + if (!kstrtoull(buf, 10, &age_sec))

nit:
Do we need such limit base which work with only 10 base?
Passing 0 would give more flexibility.

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Thanks, Brian.

> + cutoff_time = ktime_sub(ktime_get_boottime(),
> + ns_to_ktime(age_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC));
> + else
> +#endif
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> + if (!init_done(zram))
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + /* A age_sec of 0 marks everything as idle, this is the "all" behavior */
> + mark_idle(zram, cutoff_time);
> + rv = len;
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> +out:
> + return rv;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
> --
> 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-23 02:10    [W:1.894 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site