lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: core: remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl
Date
On Monday, September 20, 2021 12:36:06 PM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:52:50PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 13/09/21 9:48 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:24:39PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> > > > Remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl() as it just calling
> > > > the rtw_ps_processor().Instead of power_saving_wk_hdl() call directly
> > > > rtw_ps_processor().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > []
> > >
> > > Also does not apply to my tree. Please rebase against my staging-next
> > > branch and resend.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > I always do rebase against your staging-testing branch. Can you help me
to
> > understand.When we need to rebase on staging-next. Do we always need to
> > rebase against staging-next..!
>
> Yes, you should. When you are working on code that lots of other people
> are working on, there will be conflicts like this, and you just need to
> stay on top of it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Sorry, Greg. I'm confused... :(

As far as I know, everyone here make patches for staging-testing. You apply
them to staging-testing first and, about 24 hours later, you merge them into
staging-next.

In fact I receive two distinct messages, one after the other, when you apply
to staging-testing and then to staging-next.

This is the what I've always done here and you haven't ever asked me to
rebase against staging-next... So, why are you asking for doing that rebase
on staging-next to Saurav?

Thanks,

Fabio



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-20 13:14    [W:1.133 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site