Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <> | Subject | [RFC 01/19] trace/osnoise: Do not follow tracing_cpumask | Date | Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:43:44 +0200 |
| |
In preparation to support multiple instances, decople the osnoise/timelat workload from instance specific tracing_cpumask.
Different instances can have conflicing cpumasks, making osnoise workload management needlessly complex. Osnoise already have its global cpu mask.
I also thought about using the first instance mask, but the "first" instance could be removed before the others.
This also fixes the problem that changing the tracing_mask was not re-starting the trace.
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> --- kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 25 +++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c index ce053619f289..7b1f8187764c 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c @@ -1553,13 +1553,10 @@ static int start_per_cpu_kthreads(struct trace_array *tr) cpus_read_lock(); /* - * Run only on CPUs in which trace and osnoise are allowed to run. + * Run only on online CPUs in which trace and osnoise are allowed to + * run. */ - cpumask_and(current_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask, &osnoise_cpumask); - /* - * And the CPU is online. - */ - cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, current_mask); + cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, &osnoise_cpumask); for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(per_cpu_osnoise_var, cpu).kthread = NULL; @@ -1580,10 +1577,8 @@ static int start_per_cpu_kthreads(struct trace_array *tr) #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU static void osnoise_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *dummy) { - struct trace_array *tr = osnoise_trace; unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock); if (!osnoise_busy) @@ -1595,9 +1590,6 @@ static void osnoise_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *dummy) if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &osnoise_cpumask)) goto out_unlock; - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tr->tracing_cpumask)) - goto out_unlock; - start_kthread(cpu); out_unlock: @@ -1700,13 +1692,10 @@ static void osnoise_tracer_stop(struct trace_array *tr); * interface to the osnoise trace. By default, it lists all CPUs, * in this way, allowing osnoise threads to run on any online CPU * of the system. It serves to restrict the execution of osnoise to the - * set of CPUs writing via this interface. Note that osnoise also - * respects the "tracing_cpumask." Hence, osnoise threads will run only - * on the set of CPUs allowed here AND on "tracing_cpumask." Why not - * have just "tracing_cpumask?" Because the user might be interested - * in tracing what is running on other CPUs. For instance, one might - * run osnoise in one HT CPU while observing what is running on the - * sibling HT CPU. + * set of CPUs writing via this interface. Why not use "tracing_cpumask"? + * Because the user might be interested in tracing what is running on + * other CPUs. For instance, one might run osnoise in one HT CPU + * while observing what is running on the sibling HT CPU. */ static ssize_t osnoise_cpus_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf, size_t count, -- 2.31.1
| |