lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/24] tools: bpftool: update bpftool-prog.rst reference
From
Date
2021-09-16 12:49 UTC+0200 ~ Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> Hi Quentin,
>
> Em Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:43:45 +0100
> Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> escreveu:
>
>> 2021-09-16 11:14 UTC+0200 ~ Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
>>> The file name: Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> should be, instead: tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst.
>>>
>>> Update its cross-reference accordingly.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a2b5944fb4e0 ("selftests/bpf: Check consistency between bpftool source, doc, completion")
>>> Fixes: ff69c21a85a4 ("tools: bpftool: add documentation")
>>
>> Hi,
>> How is this a fix for the commit that added the documentation in bpftool?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
>>> index be54b7335a76..27a2c369a798 100755
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
>>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ class ManProgExtractor(ManPageExtractor):
>>> """
>>> An extractor for bpftool-prog.rst.
>>> """
>>> - filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
>>> + filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
>>>
>>> def get_attach_types(self):
>>> return self.get_rst_list('ATTACH_TYPE')
>>>
>>
>> No I don't believe it should. BPFTOOL_DIR already contains
>> 'tools/bpf/bpftool' and the os.path.join() concatenates the two path
>> fragments.
>>
>> Where is this suggestion coming from? Did you face an issue with the script?
>
> No, I didn't face any issues with this script.
>
> The suggestion cames from the script at:
>
> ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
>
> which is meant to discover broken doc references.
>
> Such script has already a rule to handle stuff under tools/:
>
> # Accept relative Documentation patches for tools/
> if ($f =~ m/tools/) {
> my $path = $f;
> $path =~ s,(.*)/.*,$1,;
> next if (grep -e, glob("$path/$ref $path/../$ref $path/$fulref"));
> }
>
> but it seems it needs a fixup in order for it to stop reporting issues
> at test_bpftool_synctypes.py:
>
> $ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
> ...
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-cgroup.rst

Oh, I see, thanks for explaining. I didn't know this script would catch
the paths in bpftool's test file.

>
> I'll drop the patches touching it for a next version, probably
> adding a fix for such script.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>

Sounds good to me, thanks a lot!
Quentin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-16 12:58    [W:0.074 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site