Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Date | Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:51:20 -0700 |
| |
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-08-05 01:00:09) > On Thu, 05 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:47 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > > There was an "unknown" firmware variant turning up in the wild > > > > causing problems in the clock driver. Add this missing variant > > > > and clarify that varian 11 and 15 are Samsung variants, as this > > > > is now very well known from released products. > > > > > > > > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > > > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > > > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > > > > Cc: phone-devel@vger.kernel.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > Clock maintainers: could you please ACK this so Lee can take > > > > this into the MFD tree? The chances of merge collisions are > > > > zero, this code changes very seldom. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 3 ++- > > > > > > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 6 ++++-- > > > > include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 3 ++- > > > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > Actually I intended for the clock people to ACK it for you > > but since it is completely independent of 1/2 it actually works > > either way, maybe they will rather pick it up, who knows? :D > > That's fine too. > > I assume they will not require an immutable branch, as the turn-over > in this file is very low. >
Seems fine to go through mfd. Isn't there some other ux500 patch on the list though?
| |