lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
From
Date
Hi Dov,


On 8/31/21 1:59 PM, Dov Murik wrote:
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The intermediate response buffer is used while decrypting the
>> + * response payload. Make sure that it has enough space to cover the
>> + * authtag.
>> + */
>> + resp_len = sizeof(resp->data) + crypto->a_len;
>> + resp = kzalloc(resp_len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>
> The length of resp->data is 64 bytes; I assume crypto->a_len is not a
> lot more (and probably known in advance for AES GCM). Maybe use a
> buffer on the stack instead of allocating and freeing?
>

The authtag size can be up to 16 bytes, so I guess I can allocate 80
bytes on stack and avoid the kzalloc().

>
>> + if (!resp)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Issue the command to get the attestation report */
>> + rc = handle_guest_request(snp_dev, req.msg_version, SNP_MSG_KEY_REQ,
>> + &req.data, sizeof(req.data), resp->data, resp_len,
>> + &arg->fw_err);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto e_free;
>> +
>> + /* Copy the response payload to userspace */
>> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg->resp_data, resp, sizeof(*resp)))
>> + rc = -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +e_free:
>> + kfree(resp);
>
> Since resp contains key material, I think you should explicit_memzero()
> it before freeing, so the key bytes don't linger around in unused
> memory. I'm not sure if any copies are made inside the
> handle_guest_request call above; maybe zero these as well.
>

I can do that, but I guess I am trying to find a reason for it. The resp
buffer is encrypted page, so, the key is protected from the hypervisor
access. Are you thinking about an attack within the VM guest OS ?

-Brijesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-31 23:05    [W:0.182 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site