Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:35:16 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: "BUG: Invalid wait context" in ls_extirq_set_type |
| |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:54:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No problem with adding raw spinlocks to regmap, I think it's just nobody > > needed them before. I've not looked at the problem in sufficient detail > > to figure out if that's actually the best solution here but from an initial > > pass through it looks reasonableit looks reasonable
> The question becomes how will syscon be told that one of its consumers > needs the regmap to use raw spinlock locking? The syscon regmap is > initialized before any of its consumers probe, AFAIU.
I'd expect it to figure this out based on the compatible string for the syscon device. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |