lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Daniel Micay wrote:

> For example, it will know that kmalloc(n) returns either NULL or an
> allocation of size n. A simple sample program with calloc in
> userspace:
>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(void) {
> char *p = calloc(64, 1);
> if (!p) {
> return 1;
> }
> printf("%zu\n", __builtin_object_size(p, 1));
> return 0;
> }
>
> It will also detect an out-of-bounds access via the allocation with
> -fsanitize=object-size including with a runtime value as the index.
>
> It's not as useful as it should be yet because __builtin_object_size
> must return a compile-time constant. Clang has a new
> __builtin_dynamic_object_size that's allowed to return a value that's
> not a compile-time constant so it can work for kmalloc(n) where n is a
> runtime value. It might not be quite ready for use yet but it should
> be able to make it a lot more useful. GCC also seems open to adding it
> too.

The other complication with kmalloc etc is that the slab allocators may
decided to allocate more bytes than needed because it does not support
that particular allocation size. Some functions check the allocated true
size and make use of that. See ksize().

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-25 12:02    [W:0.092 / U:1.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site