Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH linux-next] tools: fix warning comparing pointer to 0 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Date | Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:54:07 +0200 |
| |
On 8/20/21 5:30 AM, CGEL wrote: > From: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn> > > Fix the following coccicheck warning: > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:364:18-22:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:537:23-27:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:544:21-25:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:770:13-17:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn>
Please properly explain in the commit message what this 'fixes' exactly and why it is needed.
> --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > index 4896fdf..5c0bdab 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static INLINE void* populate_var_metadata(struct var_metadata_t* metadata, > int zero = 0; > struct var_kill_data_t* kill_data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&data_heap, &zero); > > - if (kill_data == NULL) > + if (!kill_dat)
And please don't send broken stuff like this.
> return NULL; > struct task_struct* task = (struct task_struct*)bpf_get_current_task(); > > @@ -534,14 +534,14 @@ static INLINE bool is_dentry_allowed_for_filemod(struct dentry* file_dentry, > *device_id = dev_id; > bool* allowed_device = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_devices, &dev_id); > > - if (allowed_device == NULL) > + if (!allowed_device) > return false; > > u64 ino = BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_inode, i_ino); > *file_ino = ino; > bool* allowed_file = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_file_inodes, &ino); > > - if (allowed_file == NULL) > + if (!allowed_fil)
... same. You did not bother to compile test even.
> if (!is_ancestor_in_allowed_inodes(BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_parent))) > return false; > return true; > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int raw_tracepoint__sched_process_exec(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args* ctx) > u64 inode = BPF_CORE_READ(bprm, file, f_inode, i_ino); > > bool* should_filter_binprm = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&disallowed_exec_inodes, &inode); > - if (should_filter_binprm != NULL) > + if (should_filter_binprm) > goto out; > > int zero = 0; >
| |