Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API | From | Christian König <> | Date | Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:17:28 +0200 |
| |
Am 22.08.21 um 23:23 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: > The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. > > The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below. > > It has been compile tested. > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE > + DMA_TO_DEVICE > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_NONE > + DMA_NONE > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; > @@ > - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) > + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) > + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Should we pick them up or do you want to push them upstream?
Regards, Christian.
> --- > If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML: > https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4 > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > index ac8c3251b616..4f0fbf667431 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ int radeon_dummy_page_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > if (rdev->dummy_page.page == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > rdev->dummy_page.addr = dma_map_page(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.page, > - 0, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > + 0, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > if (dma_mapping_error(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.addr)) { > dev_err(&rdev->pdev->dev, "Failed to DMA MAP the dummy page\n"); > __free_page(rdev->dummy_page.page); > @@ -808,8 +808,8 @@ void radeon_dummy_page_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev) > { > if (rdev->dummy_page.page == NULL) > return; > - pci_unmap_page(rdev->pdev, rdev->dummy_page.addr, > - PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > + dma_unmap_page(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.addr, PAGE_SIZE, > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > __free_page(rdev->dummy_page.page); > rdev->dummy_page.page = NULL; > }
| |