lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 7/7] tracing: Add a probe that attaches to trace events
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:03:42 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:56:52 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > static bool find_event_probe(const char *group, const char *event)
> > > {
> > > struct dyn_event *ev;
> > > struct trace_eprobe *ep;
> > >
> > > for_each_dyn_event(ev) {
> > > if (ev->ops != &eprobe_dyn_event_ops)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > ep = to_trace_eprobe(ev);
> > > if (strcmp(ep->tp.event->class.system, group) == 0 &&
> > > strcmp(ep->tp.event->call.name, event) == 0)
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > return false;
> > > }
> >
> > Yeah, but I think this should be done with event_mutex, shouldn't it?
>
> Probably. I noticed that it was updated under the dyn_event_ops_mutex,
> and thought that was enough protection. But I now see the lockdep
> assert on the event_mutex in the other functions.
>
> Is there ever a case where this list is updated without
> dyn_event_ops_mutex held?

dyn_event_ops_mutex is for the "dyn_event_ops_list" which manages
the list of "struct dyn_event_operations" (e.g. kprobe, uprobe, synthetic).

In kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c, you can see,

/* Protected by event_mutex */
LIST_HEAD(dyn_event_list);

:)

Thank you,


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-19 06:29    [W:0.059 / U:0.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site