lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.10 49/96] net/mlx5: Fix return value from tracer initialization
Date
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 19:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > [ Upstream commit bd37c2888ccaa5ceb9895718f6909b247cc372e0 ]
> >
> > Check return value of mlx5_fw_tracer_start(), set error path and
> > fix
> > return value of mlx5_fw_tracer_init() accordingly.
>
> This is actually two fixes in one: There's cancel_work_sync() added
> to

Yes, the reasoning was that the patch is fixing the whole error path of
the function in one-shot since we can blame it on a single commit.

> the error path, but there's additional error that needs fixing.

Yes.

>
> Could someone familiar with the code verify it after me?
>
> Best regards,
>                                                                 Pavel
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> index 3dfcb20e97c6..857be86b4a11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int mlx5_fw_tracer_init(struct mlx5_fw_tracer
> *tracer)
>         err = mlx5_core_alloc_pd(dev, &tracer->buff.pdn);
>         if (err) {
>                 mlx5_core_warn(dev, "FWTracer: Failed to allocate PD
> %d\n", err);
> -               return err;
> +               goto err_cancel_work;
>         }
>  
>         err = mlx5_fw_tracer_create_mkey(tracer);
> @@ -1031,6 +1031,7 @@ int mlx5_fw_tracer_init(struct mlx5_fw_tracer
> *tracer)
>         mlx5_core_destroy_mkey(dev, &tracer->buff.mkey);
>  err_dealloc_pd:
>         mlx5_core_dealloc_pd(dev, tracer->buff.pdn);
> +err_cancel_work:
>         cancel_work_sync(&tracer->read_fw_strings_work);
>         return err;

this is correct, do you want to submit this patch or do you want us to
handle ?
maybe it is better if we delayed queue_work() to after all the fragile
code behind it, to reduce the error path handling ..

thanks for pointing this out.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-18 09:44    [W:0.265 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site