[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] mm: introduce process_reap system call
On Mon 05-07-21 09:41:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.07.21 17:27, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > That one was my favorite from the list I gave too but maybe we can
> > satisfy Andy too if we use one of:
> > - process_mfree()
> > - process_mrelease()
> >
> FWIW, I tend to like process_mrelease(), due to the implied "release" ("free
> the memory if there are no other references") semantics.


> Further, a new
> syscall feels cleaner than some magic sysfs/procfs toggle. Just my 2 cents.

Yeah, proc based interface is both tricky to use and kinda ugly now that
pidfd can solve all at in once.

My original preference was a more generic kill syscall to allow flags
but a dedicated syscall doesn't look really bad either.
Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-07 14:41    [W:0.110 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site