lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 10/69] KVM: TDX: Print the name of SEAMCALL status code
From
Date
On 03/07/21 00:04, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
>
> SEAMCALL error code is not intuitive to tell what's wrong in the
> SEAMCALL, print the error code name along with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/boot/seam/tdx_common.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/seamcall.h | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/boot/seam/tdx_common.c b/arch/x86/kvm/boot/seam/tdx_common.c
> index d803dbd11693..4fe352fb8586 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/boot/seam/tdx_common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/boot/seam/tdx_common.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_boot.h>
>
> #include "vmx/tdx_arch.h"
> +#include "vmx/tdx_errno.h"
>
> /*
> * TDX system information returned by TDSYSINFO.
> @@ -165,3 +166,23 @@ void tdx_keyid_free(int keyid)
> ida_free(&tdx_keyid_pool, keyid);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_keyid_free);
> +
> +static struct tdx_seamcall_status {
> + u64 err_code;
> + const char *err_name;
> +} tdx_seamcall_status_codes[] = {TDX_SEAMCALL_STATUS_CODES};
> +
> +const char *tdx_seamcall_error_name(u64 error_code)
> +{
> + struct tdx_seamcall_status status;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tdx_seamcall_status_codes); i++) {
> + status = tdx_seamcall_status_codes[i];
> + if ((error_code & TDX_SEAMCALL_STATUS_MASK) == status.err_code)
> + return status.err_name;
> + }
> +
> + return "Unknown SEAMCALL status code";
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_seamcall_error_name);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/seamcall.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/seamcall.h
> index 2c83ab46eeac..fbb18aea1720 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/seamcall.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/seamcall.h
> @@ -37,11 +37,14 @@ static inline u64 _seamcall(u64 op, u64 rcx, u64 rdx, u64 r8, u64 r9, u64 r10,
> _seamcall(SEAMCALL_##op, (rcx), (rdx), (r8), (r9), (r10), (ex))
> #endif
>
> +const char *tdx_seamcall_error_name(u64 error_code);
> +
> static inline void __pr_seamcall_error(u64 op, const char *op_str,
> u64 err, struct tdx_ex_ret *ex)
> {
> - pr_err_ratelimited("SEAMCALL[%s] failed on cpu %d: 0x%llx\n",
> - op_str, smp_processor_id(), (err));
> + pr_err_ratelimited("SEAMCALL[%s] failed on cpu %d: %s (0x%llx)\n",
> + op_str, smp_processor_id(),
> + tdx_seamcall_error_name(err), err);
> if (ex)
> pr_err_ratelimited(
> "RCX 0x%llx, RDX 0x%llx, R8 0x%llx, R9 0x%llx, R10 0x%llx, R11 0x%llx\n",
>

You can squash it in the earlier patch that introduced __pr_seamcall_error.

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-06 15:29    [W:0.879 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site