lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: ricoh,rn5t618: ADC related nodes and properties
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 17:02:45 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 10:42:21 +0200
> Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> wrote:
>
> > Add ADC related nodes and properties. This will allow to wire
> > up ADC channels to consumers, especially to measure input voltages
> > by the power subdevice.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/mfd/ricoh,rn5t618.yaml | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ricoh,rn5t618.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ricoh,rn5t618.yaml
> > index 032a7fb0b4a7..185f87a14a54 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ricoh,rn5t618.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ricoh,rn5t618.yaml
> > @@ -73,6 +73,48 @@ properties:
> > description: |
> > See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
> >
> > + adc:
> > + type: object
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - ricoh,rn5t618-adc
> > + - ricoh,rc5t619-adc
> > +
> > + "#io-channel-cells":
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > + additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - "#io-channel-cells"
>
> Strictly required? If not used below (where it is optional)
> then why do we require the ADC driver to provided the services?
>
> I don't mind you leave it as it is though if you prefer - it doesn't
> do any harm!
>
ok, it is not that strictly required.

Regards,
Andreas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-03 18:44    [W:0.074 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site