lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc: warn for invalid SDIO data buffers 【请注意,邮件由代 发】
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:02 AM Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> On 2021/6/30 20:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > Jernej Skrabec reported a problem with the cw1200 driver failing on
> > arm64 systems with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y.
> >
> > The driver in this case passes a pointer to a stack variable (in vmalloc
> > space) into the sdio layer, which gets translated into an invalid DMA
> > address.
> >
> > Even without CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, the driver is still unreliable, as
> > cache invalidations on the DMA buffer may cause random data corruption
> > in adjacent stack slots.
> >
> > This could be worked around in the SDIO core, but in the discussion we
> > decided that passing a stack variable into SDIO should always be considered
> > a bug, as it is for USB drivers.
> >
> > Change the sdio core to produce a one-time warning for any on-stack
> > (both with and without CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) as well as any vmalloc
> > or module-local address that would have the same translation problem.
>
> This was the previous comment about the same topic.
> Should we check for mmc_io_rw_direct?
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg41794.html

Hi Shawn,

thank you for remembering that previous discussion, that is a
good question. Looking at the code though, I don't actually
see any part of mmc_io_rw_direct() doing DMA on a caller-provided
buffer. The only thing I see in the code is a 'u8 *out' argument, but
that is just a pointer to a single byte that is set by this function.

Do you see any other issue with that function, or does that mean
we don't have to change it?

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-02 09:04    [W:0.059 / U:2.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site