lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next 2/2] staging: r8188eu: use eth_broadcast_addr() to assign broadcast address
From
Date
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 19:01 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:45:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 16:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:16:20PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> > > > Use eth_broadcast_addr() to assign broadcast address.
> > >
> > > That says what you do, but not _why_ you are doing this?
> > >
> > > Why make this change? What benifit does it provide?
> >
> > The commit message is clear and concise as using available kernel
> > mechanisms is better than homegrown or duplicative ones.
> >
> > Are you asking merely becuse Liu Shixin hasn't had many staging
> > commits?
>
> I'm asking because this changelog text does not explain why this is
> needed at all and needs to be changed to do so.

IYO.

IMO it's obvious and fine as is and you are asking for overly
fine-grained analyses in commit messages.

The subject is clear though the commit message is merely duplicative.

It _could_ show the reduction in object size for some versions of gcc.

$ size drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.o*
text data bss dec hex filename
53259 372 2430 56061 dafd drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.o.gcc6.new
53355 372 2430 56157 db5d drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.o.gcc6.old
54673 372 2430 57475 e083 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.o.gcc10.new
54673 372 2430 57475 e083 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.o.gcc10.old

It _could_ describe how the kernel mechanisms depend on a minimum
alignment of __aligned(2) in the tested address and also show that
the address is properly minimum aligned.

struct ieee80211_hdr {
__le16 frame_control;
__le16 duration_id;
u8 addr1[ETH_ALEN];
u8 addr2[ETH_ALEN];
u8 addr3[ETH_ALEN];
__le16 seq_ctrl;
u8 addr4[ETH_ALEN];
} __packed __aligned(2);
[...]
struct ieee80211_hdr *pwlanhdr;
[...]
- ether_addr_copy(pwlanhdr->addr1, bc_addr);
+ eth_broadcast_addr(pwlanhdr->addr1);

It _could_ show that the commit has some effect on runtime.
It _could_ show that it passes some (unavailable) regression test.

IMO: None of those are really necessary here.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-08 19:35    [W:0.127 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site