lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] memory: Tegra memory controller for v5.14
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 01:01:29PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof, Thierry,
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 10:49:10AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi Thierry and Will,
> >
> > This is the pull for you to base further SMMU aptches (prevent early SMMU
> > faults).
>
> This is a tonne of code for me to pull into the SMMU tree given that I only
> want one patch!
>
> Thierry, if I just stick:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210603164632.1000458-4-thierry.reding@gmail.com
>
> on its own branch, can you stitch together whatever you need?

I'm not sure I understand what you're proposing. For reference, here's
the set of patches that I sent out:

1. memory: tegra: Implement SID override programming
2. dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add Tegra186 compatible string
3. iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize()
4. iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime
5. iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Implement SID override programming
6. iommu/arm-smmu: Use Tegra implementation on Tegra186
7. arm64: tegra: Use correct compatible string for Tegra186 SMMU
8. arm64: tegra: Hook up memory controller to SMMU on Tegra186
9. arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support on Tegra194

Krzysztof already picked up patch 1 and I was assuming that you'd pick
up 2-6 because they are to the ARM SMMU driver. However, if you're
primarily interested in just patch 3, which is more "core" ARM SMMU than
the rest, which are Tegra-specific, then I suppose what we could do is
for you to give an Acked-by on the rest (2, 4-6) and then Krzysztof or I
can pick them up and take them via ARM SoC, based on the stable branch
from your tree that only has patch 3.

Patch 6 touches arm-smmu-impl.c, though it's a two-line change that
touches only the Tegra-specific matching bit in arm_smmu_impl_init(), so
the likelihood of that conflicting with anything else is fairly small.

Is that what you were proposing?

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-08 16:37    [W:0.087 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site