Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:08:27 +0200 | From | Uwe Kleine-König <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state |
| |
Hello Thierry,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > In the interest of making forward progress, I've applied this series.
I proposed a different approach that in contrast to usage_power:
- is well defined (so driver authors and consumers know what to provide or expect resp.); - has good name people understand without reading documentation; - fully covers the problem Clemens want to address; - fully covers what the only implementing lowlevel driver does; and - is easy to implement based on the patches in this series
This is not what I call "forward progress". I take it personal that after I pointed out technical shortcomings with this patch set and even suggested a better concept, you didn't even made the effort to argue but instead simply went on applying the patches.
Can you please point out what I'm missing?
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |