lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] riscv: soc: Initial DTS for Allwinner D1 NeZha board
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:24 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patches
>
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 09:04:07AM +0000, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > Add initial DTS for Allwinner D1 NeZha board having only essential
> > devices (uart, dummy, clock, reset, clint, plic, etc).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Co-Developed-by: Liu Shaohua <liush@allwinnertech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Shaohua <liush@allwinnertech.com>
> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
> > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > Cc: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
> > Cc: Wei Fu <wefu@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Wei Wu <lazyparser@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile | 2 +
> > .../boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dts | 29 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Can you add the riscv folder to our MAINTAINERS entry as well?
Yes

>
> > 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1.dtsi
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > index fe996b8..3e7b264 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > @@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
> > subdir-y += sifive
> > subdir-$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN_K210_DTB_BUILTIN) += canaan
> > subdir-y += microchip
> > +subdir-y += allwinner
>
> I assume they should be ordered alphabetically?
Thx for pointing it out.

>
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) := $(addsuffix /, $(subdir-y))
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..4adbf4b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_SUNXI) += allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..cd9f7c9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1-nezha-kit.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "allwinner-d1.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + model = "Allwinner D1 NeZha Kit";
> > + compatible = "allwinner,d1-nezha-kit";
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200";
> > + stdout-path = &serial0;
> > + };
> > +
> > + memory@40000000 {
> > + device_type = "memory";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc {
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&serial0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..11cd938
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/allwinner-d1.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + model = "Allwinner D1 Soc";
> > + compatible = "allwinner,d1-nezha-kit";
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpus {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + timebase-frequency = <2400000>;
> > + cpu@0 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > + compatible = "riscv";
> > + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdcv";
> > + mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> > + cpu0_intc: interrupt-controller {
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + ranges;
> > +
> > + reset: reset-sample {
> > + compatible = "thead,reset-sample";
> > + plic-delegate = <0x0 0x101ffffc>;
> > + };
>
> This compatible is not documented anywhere?
It used by opensbi (riscv runtime firmware), not in Linux. But I think
we should keep it.

>
> Maxime



--
Best Regards
Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-07 10:09    [W:0.130 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site