lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing
Hi Will and Claire,

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:17:27PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:43 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:55:20PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> > > > Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and
> > > > use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be
> > > > useful later to allow for different pools.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > This patch as commit af452ec1b1a3 ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce
> > > for swiotlb data bouncing") causes my Ryzen 3 4300G system to fail to
> > > get to an X session consistently (although not every single time),
> > > presumably due to a crash in the AMDGPU driver that I see in dmesg.
> > >
> > > I have attached logs at af452ec1b1a3 and f127c9556a8e and I am happy
> > > to provide any further information, debug, or test patches as necessary.
> >
> > Are you using swiotlb=force? or the swiotlb_map is called because of
> > !dma_capable? (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/kernel/dma/direct.h#n93)
>
> The command line is in the dmesg:
>
> | Kernel command line: initrd=\amd-ucode.img initrd=\initramfs-linux-next-llvm.img root=PARTUUID=8680aa0c-cf09-4a69-8cf3-970478040ee7 rw intel_pstate=no_hwp irqpoll
>
> but I worry that this looks _very_ similar to the issue reported by Qian
> Cai which we thought we had fixed. Nathan -- is the failure deterministic?

Yes, for the most part. It does not happen every single boot so when I
was bisecting, I did a series of seven boots and only considered the
revision good when all seven of them made it to LightDM's greeter. My
results that I notated show most bad revisions failed anywhere from four
to six times.

> > `BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000003a8290` and
> > the fact it crashed at `_raw_spin_lock_irqsave` look like the memory
> > (maybe dev->dma_io_tlb_mem) was corrupted?
> > The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem should be set here
> > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/pci/probe.c#n2528)
> > through device_initialize.
>
> I'm less sure about this. 'dma_io_tlb_mem' should be pointing at
> 'io_tlb_default_mem', which is a page-aligned allocation from memblock.
> The spinlock is at offset 0x24 in that structure, and looking at the
> register dump from the crash:
>
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffadb4013db9e8 EFLAGS: 00010006
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: RAX: 00000000003a8290 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8900572ad580
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: RDX: ffff89005653f024 RSI: 00000000000c0000 RDI: 0000000000001d17
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: RBP: 000000000a20d000 R08: 00000000000c0000 R09: 0000000000000000
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: R10: 000000000a20d000 R11: ffff89005653f000 R12: 0000000000000212
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000200000
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: FS: 00007f1f8898ea40(0000) GS:ffff890057280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: CR2: 00000000003a8290 CR3: 00000001020d0000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: Call Trace:
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x50
> Jun 29 18:28:42 hp-4300G kernel: swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0x12b/0x4c0
>
> Then that correlates with R11 holding the 'dma_io_tlb_mem' pointer and
> RDX pointing at the spinlock. Yet RAX is holding junk :/
>
> I agree that enabling KASAN would be a good idea, but I also think we
> probably need to get some more information out of swiotlb_tbl_map_single()
> to see see what exactly is going wrong in there.

I can certainly enable KASAN and if there is any debug print I can add
or dump anything, let me know!

Cheers,
Nathan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-30 17:57    [W:0.369 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site