[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usb: host: ohci-at91: suspend/resume ports after/before OHCI accesses
On 24.06.2021 16:23, Alan Stern wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 06:40:25AM +0000, wrote:
>> On 23.06.2021 19:41, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> Are there any systems beside the SAMA7G5 and others you tested which
>>> might be affected by this patch? Do they all work pretty much the
>>> same way? (I want to make sure no others will be adversely affected
>>> by this change.)
>> I tested it on SAMA7G5, SAMA5D2 and SAM9X60. I tested the suspend/resume
>> to/from mem. On SAMA5D2 and SAM9X60 there is no clock provided by
>> transceiver A to OHCI. I encountered no issues on tested systems. These IPs
>> are also present on SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D4 systems which I haven't tested as I
>> expect to behave as SAMA5D2 (as the clocking scheme is the same with
>> SAMA5D2). I can also try it on a SAMA5D3 (I don't have a SAMA5D4 with me at
>> the moment), tough, just to be sure nothing is broken there too.
> That doesn't answer my question. I asked if there were any systems
> which might be affected by your patch, and you listed a bunch of
> systems that _aren't_ affected (that is, they continue to work
> properly).

I wrongly understood the initial question.

> What systems might run into trouble with this patch?

These are all I haven't tested and might be affected:

The last two (SAM9X35 and SAM9G45) have the same clocking scheme with
SAMA5D2 (which I tested). For the rest of them I cannot find the clocking
scheme in datasheet and don't have them to test (at least at the moment).

Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea

> Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-30 16:49    [W:8.018 / U:0.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site