lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] arm pl011 serial: support multi-irq request
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 07:25:05PM +0800, Bing Fan wrote:
> From: Bing Fan <tombinfan@tencent.com>
>
> In order to make pl011 work better, multiple interrupts are
> required, such as TXIM, RXIM, RTIM, error interrupt(FE/PE/BE/OE);
> at the same time, pl011 to GIC does not merge the interrupt
> lines(each serial-interrupt corresponding to different GIC hardware
> interrupt), so need to enable and request multiple gic interrupt
> numbers in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Fan <tombinfan@tencent.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index 78682c12156a..e84f4b9dff87 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -1701,11 +1701,40 @@ static void pl011_write_lcr_h(struct uart_amba_port *uap, unsigned int lcr_h)
> }
> }
>
> +static void pl011_release_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap, unsigned int max_cnt)
> +{
> + struct amba_device *amba_dev = container_of(uap->port.dev, struct amba_device, dev);

Pass in the amba_dev instead here, you already have a pointer to it at
all places, right?

> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < max_cnt; i++) {
> + if (amba_dev->irq[i])
> + free_irq(amba_dev->irq[i], uap);
> + }

You do not need { } here, didn't checkpatch warn about this?

> +}
> +
> static int pl011_allocate_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
> {
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + unsigned int virq;
> + struct amba_device *amba_dev = container_of(uap->port.dev, struct amba_device, dev);
> +
> pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
>
> - return request_irq(uap->port.irq, pl011_int, IRQF_SHARED, "uart-pl011", uap);
> + for (i = 0; i < AMBA_NR_IRQS; i++) {
> + virq = amba_dev->irq[i];
> + if (virq == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = request_irq(virq, pl011_int, IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&amba_dev->dev), uap);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(uap->port.dev, "request %u interrupt failed\n", virq);
> + pl011_release_irq(uap, i - 1);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1864,7 +1893,7 @@ static void pl011_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
>
> pl011_dma_shutdown(uap);
>
> - free_irq(uap->port.irq, uap);
> + pl011_release_irq(uap, AMBA_NR_IRQS);

Ah, so your original patch was not correct either, how well have you
tested these changes?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-30 14:28    [W:0.065 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site