lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3 3/4] memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region()
Date
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

There maybe an overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() if it is called with
base and size such that

base + size > PHYS_ADDR_MAX

Make sure that memblock_overlaps_region() caps the size to prevent such
overflow and remove now duplicated call to memblock_cap_size() from
memblock_is_region_reserved().

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
mm/memblock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 2e25d69739e0..67e0e24f8cc9 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
{
unsigned long i;

+ memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
+
for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++)
if (memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, type->regions[i].base,
type->regions[i].size))
@@ -1794,7 +1796,6 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t siz
*/
bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_reserved(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
- memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}

--
2.28.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-30 09:13    [W:0.124 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site