lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_S2_GUEST stage-2 flag
From
Date
Hi Quentin,

On 2021/6/2 18:43, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Hi Yanan,
>
> On Thursday 15 Apr 2021 at 19:50:27 (+0800), Yanan Wang wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> index c3674c47d48c..a43cbe697b37 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> @@ -61,10 +61,12 @@ struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops {
>> * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_NOFWB: Don't enforce Normal-WB even if the CPUs have
>> * ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB.
>> * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP: Only use identity mappings.
>> + * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_GUEST: Whether the page-tables are guest stage-2.
>> */
>> enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags {
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_NOFWB = BIT(0),
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP = BIT(1),
>> + KVM_PGTABLE_S2_GUEST = BIT(2),
> Assuming that we need this flag (maybe not given Marc's suggestion on
> another patch), I'd recommend re-naming it to explain _what_ it does,
> rather than _who_ is using it.
I agree with this.
> That's the principle we followed for e.g. KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP, so we
> should be consistent here as well.
But I think maybe we don't need the new flag anymore with Marc's suggestion.
Currently the CMOs right before installation or update of a PTE are
guest-specific.
So if we also take the new optional callbacks as guest specific, then a
new flag is
not necessary because we can check whether the callbacks have been
initialized
to determine if we are managing a guest S2 PTE.

Thanks,
Yanan
> Thanks,
> Quentin
> .

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-03 14:36    [W:0.065 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site