lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] drm/pl111: depend on CONFIG_VEXPRESS_CONFIG
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:41:01PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:29 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 02:19:52PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:43 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:53 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Avoid randconfig build failures by requiring VEXPRESS_CONFIG:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.o: in function `pl111_vexpress_clcd_init':
> > > > > > pl111_versatile.c:(.text+0x220): undefined reference to `devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config'
> > > > >
> > > > > pl111_vexpress_clcd_init() starts with:
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VEXPRESS_CONFIG))
> > > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't that supposed to be enough to avoid an undefined reference?
> > >
> > > Ah! I missed that when reading the code. I see the problem now. It's
> > > because of:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_VEXPRESS_CONFIG=m
> > > CONFIG_DRM_PL111=y
> > >
> > > I think the right fix is:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/Kconfig
> > > index 80f6748055e3..662fc38f92ba 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/Kconfig
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config DRM_PL111
> > > tristate "DRM Support for PL111 CLCD Controller"
> > > depends on DRM
> > > depends on ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > > + depends on VEXPRESS_CONFIG=y || VEXPRESS_CONFIG=DRM
> >
> > Oops, no, I had this backwairds:
> >
> > depends on !VEXPRESS_CONFIG || VEXPRESS_CONFIG=DRM
>
> Can you pls throw this into an incremental patch on top of
> drm-misc-next? It's a non-rebasing tree and all that (linux-next
> should have it next day too I guess).

Ah! Yes, sorry. I wasn't sure if you'd reverted it yet. One moment...

-Kees

--
Kees Cook

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-03 23:49    [W:0.073 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site