Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:48:42 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver |
| |
> > Obviously, I don't know much about the specs and their wording. Still I > > wonder if we can't call it a zero length transfer? > > Maybe that.
I'd prefer it.
> > This is allowed by > > the I2C standard and SMBus has even a proper name for it (SMBUS_QUICK). > > From my point of view, I would not say it is device specific because > > devices are expected to ACK such a message. > > Actually we should skip the last line from my diff, i.e. completely > drop "and result for such a request is I2C device specific".
Sounds good.
> The device (host in virtio spec terminology) still needs to return > success/failure as it does for other requests. Nothing special here.
Ack.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |