lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tcp: Do not reset the icsk_ca_initialized in tcp_init_transfer.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:20:19PM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> )
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:15 PM Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/29/2021 12:24 AM, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Can you also please provide a summary of the event sequence that
> > > triggers the bug? Based on your Reported-by tag, I guess this is based
> > > on the syzbot reproducer:
> > >
> > > https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/VbHoSsBz0hk/m/cOxOoTgPCAAJ
> > >
> > > but perhaps you can give a summary of the event sequence that causes
> > > the bug? Is it that the call:
> > >
> > > setsockopt$inet_tcp_TCP_CONGESTION(r0, 0x6, 0xd,
> > > &(0x7f0000000000)='cdg\x00', 0x4)
> > >
> > > initializes the CC and happens before the connection is established,
> > > and then when the connection is established, the line that sets:
> > > icsk->icsk_ca_initialized = 0;
> > > is incorrect, causing the CC to be initialized again without first
> > > calling the cleanup code that deallocates the CDG-allocated memory?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > neal
> > >
> >
> > Hi Neal,
> >
> > The gdb stack trace that lead to init_transfer_input() is as bellow, the
> > current sock state is TCP_SYN_RECV.
>
> Thanks. That makes sense as a snapshot of time for
> tcp_init_transfer(), but I think what would be more useful would be a
> description of the sequence of events, including when the CC was
> initialized previous to that point (as noted above, was it that the
> setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) completed before that point?).
+1. It needs to first explain when was the very first CC initialized.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-29 01:43    [W:0.115 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site