lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:02:27 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:41:26 +0800
> Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >
> > One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When
> > SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
> >
> > This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
> >
> > Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> > [handle endianness of sym->st_shndx]
> > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
>
> Thanks, I pulled this in and started the testing.
>

It passed my normal tests. I'll run my cross compile test, and I just
pushed it to linux-next. I'll wait a few days before I push it to Linus.

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-17 02:23    [W:0.075 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site