Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:23:02 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling |
| |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:02:27 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:41:26 +0800 > Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When > > SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0. > > > > This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX. > > > > Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> > > [handle endianness of sym->st_shndx] > > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> > > --- > > Thanks, I pulled this in and started the testing. >
It passed my normal tests. I'll run my cross compile test, and I just pushed it to linux-next. I'll wait a few days before I push it to Linus.
-- Steve
| |