Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Convert the Speakup guide to rst | From | Igor Torrente <> | Date | Tue, 1 Jun 2021 20:43:18 -0300 |
| |
Hi Samuel,
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Igor Torrente, le mar. 01 juin 2021 12:11:26 -0300, a ecrit: >>>> +| acntsa -- Accent SA >>>> +| acntpc -- Accent PC >>>> +| apollo -- Apollo >>>> +| audptr -- Audapter >>>> +| bns -- Braille 'n Speak >>>> +| dectlk -- DecTalk Express (old and new, db9 serial only) >>>> +| decext -- DecTalk (old) External >>>> +| dtlk -- DoubleTalk PC >>>> +| keypc -- Keynote Gold PC >>>> +| ltlk -- DoubleTalk LT, LiteTalk, or external Tripletalk (db9 serial only) >>>> +| spkout -- Speak Out >>>> +| txprt -- Transport >>>> +| dummy -- Plain text terminal >>> >>> Looks like a definition list? >>> >>> https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#definition-lists >> >> If the '|' is replaced by definition-list, I'll have to skip a line to each >> item so the sphinx doesn't concatenate them into a single line. Like this: >> >> keywords >> acntsa -- Accent SA >> >> acntpc -- Accent PC >> >> apollo -- Apollo >> [...] >> >> >> There's a way to do that without these blank lines? > > The blank line isn't really a problem. > >>>> +Document License >>>> +================ >>>> + >>> >>> Using SPDX might be nice. >> >> I was just trying to respect the original text as much as possible, but I >> don't mind change it if everybody agrees with it. > > SPDX should be fine.
I have two questions about it.
1 - Should I only make this change when we have the 'acks' from all the previous contributors? Or can I change it to the v3?
2 - Is '.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0' at the beginning is enough?
> > Samuel >
Thanks, --- Igor M. A. Torrente
| |