lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Process failure of sensor_hub_set_feature()
Date
Hi Benjamin,

On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 15:28 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> >
> > > When user modifies a custom feature value and
> > > sensor_hub_set_feature()
> > > fails, return error.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Replaces patch: HID: hid-sensor-custom: remove useless variable
> > > by Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> > >
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-
> > > sensor-custom.c
> > > index 2628bc53ed80..58b54b127cdf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device
> > > *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > >                                                              
> > > report_id;
> > >               ret = sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev,
> > > report_id,
> > >                                            index, sizeof(value),
> > > &value);
> > > +             if (ret)
> > > +                     return ret;
> >
> > What tree is this patch against? In my tree, we're not even
> > assigning
> > sensor_hub_set_feature() return value to anything.
> >
>
> I guess there was a "collision". At roughly the same time I merged
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=456269
> people were starting to send various patches for the same thing.
>
> Srinivas, either the change in for-next (and probably Linus' master
> now) is fine, or could you rebase on top of hid.git?
>

Rebased and attached based on top of the latest mainline.

Thanks,
Srinivas


> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>

From 461b85d5869bdc2da84df8aced8a181647082ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:52:32 -0700
Subject: [UPDATED][PATCH 2/2] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Process failure of
sensor_hub_set_feature()

When user modifies a custom feature value and sensor_hub_set_feature()
fails, return error.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
Updates:
Rebased on top of the latest mainline

drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 2e6662173a79..32c2306e240d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
struct hid_sensor_custom *sensor_inst = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int index, field_index, usage;
char name[HID_CUSTOM_NAME_LENGTH];
- int value;
+ int value, ret;

if (sscanf(attr->attr.name, "feature-%x-%x-%s", &index, &usage,
name) == 3) {
@@ -403,8 +403,10 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,

report_id = sensor_inst->fields[field_index].attribute.
report_id;
- sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev, report_id,
- index, sizeof(value), &value);
+ ret = sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev, report_id,
+ index, sizeof(value), &value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
} else
return -EINVAL;

--
2.27.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-06 06:46    [W:0.093 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site