[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] stackdepot: Use a raw spinlock in stack depot

> So why is this a false positive that we just need to silence?
> I see LOCKDEP is saying we are doing something wrong, and your
> description just describes how we are doing something wrong :)
> If this is a special false positive case, it would be good to have a
> comment on DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK explaining why we are using it.
> I wonder why we never saw this on syzbot. Is it an RT kernel or some
> other special config?

This happened in a special configuration that triggered ACPI errors at
boot time.

It's probably not something that is normally executed, as well as syzbot is

probably not exercising bootup anyways.

> A similar issue was discussed recently for RT kernel:
> And I think it may be fixable in the same way -- make stackdepot not
> allocate in contexts where it's not OK to allocate.

Yes that's a good idea. I've seen also other errors about the allocator

by stack depot being in the wrong context. Probably doing that would be
the right

fix. But I actually tried to switch depot to GFP_ATOMIC allocations
(from GFP_NOWAIT),

but it didn't help, so I'm not fully sure what needs to be changed.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-04 17:34    [W:0.055 / U:6.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site