Messages in this thread | | | From | Vitaly Kuznetsov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used() | Date | Mon, 24 May 2021 16:37:59 +0200 |
| |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 24/05/21 16:09, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> You mean we'll be using: >> >> "hv_evmcs_ptr == 0" meaning "no evmcs" (like now) >> "hv_evmcs_ptr == -1" meaing "evmcs not yet mapped" (and >> nested_evmcs_is_used() will check for both '0' and '-1') >> "hv_evmcs_ptr == anything else" - eVMCS mapped. > > I was thinking of: > > hv_evmcs_ptr == -1 meaning no evmcs > > hv_evmcs == NULL meaning "evmcs not yet mapped" (I think) > > hv_evmcs != NULL meaning "evmcs mapped". > > As usual with my suggestions, I'm not sure if this makes sense :) but if > it does, the code should be nicer.
Ok, let me try this!
-- Vitaly
| |