Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 20 May 2021 13:44:29 +0200 | | From | Petr Mladek <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kthread: Fix kthread_mod_delayed_work vs kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync race |
| |
On Thu 2021-05-13 14:54:57, Martin Liu wrote: > We encountered a system hang issue while doing the tests. The callstack > is as following > > schedule+0x80/0x100 > schedule_timeout+0x48/0x138 > wait_for_common+0xa4/0x134 > wait_for_completion+0x1c/0x2c > kthread_flush_work+0x114/0x1cc > kthread_cancel_work_sync.llvm.16514401384283632983+0xe8/0x144 > kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x18/0x2c > xxxx_pm_notify+0xb0/0xd8 > blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x80/0x194 > pm_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x28/0x4c > suspend_prepare+0x40/0x260 > enter_state+0x80/0x3f4 > pm_suspend+0x60/0xdc > state_store+0x108/0x144 > kobj_attr_store+0x38/0x88 > sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0xc0 > kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x108/0x1d0 > vfs_write+0x2f4/0x368 > ksys_write+0x7c/0xec > > When we started investigating, we found race between > kthread_mod_delayed_work vs kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync. The race's > result could be simply reproduced as a kthread_mod_delayed_work with > a following kthread_flush_work call.
One more thing.
This scenario might mean that the kthread_worker API is used a wrong way.
kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync() is typically called when the work should never run any longer. But the parallel kthread_mod_delayed_work() might queue it right after kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync() succeded. As a result that work might get procced even when it was cancelled.
The API caller should prevent this race. It should have its own logic around kthread_worker_queue*() and kthread_worker_mod_delayed_work() calls that will prevent calling these when the work should stay cancelled. For example, see
if (clamping && w_data->clamping && cpu_online(w_data->cpu)) kthread_queue_delayed_work(w_data->worker, &w_data->idle_injection_work, sleeptime);
in clamp_idle_injection_func().
Best Regards, Petr
|  |