Messages in this thread |  | | From | Dan Williams <> | | Date | Mon, 10 May 2021 18:07:06 -0700 | | Subject | Re: [RFC v2 14/32] x86/tdx: Handle port I/O |
| |
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:30 PM Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote: [..] > It is mainly used by functions like __tdx_hypercall(),__tdx_hypercall_vendor_kvm() > and tdx_in{b,w,l}. > > u64 __tdx_hypercall(u64 fn, u64 r12, u64 r13, u64 r14, u64 r15, > struct tdx_hypercall_output *out); > u64 __tdx_hypercall_vendor_kvm(u64 fn, u64 r12, u64 r13, u64 r14, > u64 r15, struct tdx_hypercall_output *out); > > struct tdx_hypercall_output { > u64 r11; > u64 r12; > u64 r13; > u64 r14; > u64 r15; > };
Why is this by register name and not something like:
struct tdx_hypercall_payload { u64 data[5]; };
...because the code in this patch is reading the payload out of a stack relative offset, not r11.
> > > Functions like __tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_hypercall_vendor_kvm() are used > by TDX guest to request services (like RDMSR, WRMSR,GetQuote, etc) from VMM > using TDCALL instruction. do_tdx_hypercall() is the helper function (in > tdcall.S) which actually implements this ABI. > > As per current ABI, VMM will use registers R11-R15 to share the output > values with the guest.
Which ABI, __tdx_hypercall_vendor_kvm()? The code is putting the payload on the stack, so I'm not sure what ABI you are referring to?
> So we have defined the structure > struct tdx_hypercall_output to group all output registers and make it easier > to share it with users of the TDCALLs. This is Linux defined structure. > > If there are any changes in TDCALL ABI for VMM, we might have to extend > this structure to accommodate new output register changes. So if we > define TDVMCALL_OUTPUT_SIZE as 40, we will have modify this value for > any future struct tdx_hypercall_output changes. So to avoid it, we have > allocated double the size. > > May be I should define it as, > > #define TDVMCALL_OUTPUT_SIZE sizeof(struct tdx_hypercall_output)
An arrangement like that seems more reasonable than a seemingly arbitrary number and an ominous warning about things that may happen in the future.
|  |