Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] ima: Fix function name error in comment. | From | Jiele Zhao <> | Date | Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:20:37 +0800 |
| |
Hi Mimi,
On 2021/4/6 10:12, Jiele Zhao wrote: > The original function name was ima_path_check(). The policy parsing > still supports PATH_CHECK. Commit 9bbb6cad0173 ("ima: rename > ima_path_check to ima_file_check") renamed the function to > ima_file_check(), but missed modifying the function name in the > comment. > > Fixes: 9bbb6cad0173 ("ima: rename ima_path_check to ima_file_check"). > > Signed-off-by: Jiele Zhao <unclexiaole@gmail.com> > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > index 9ef748ea829f..03bef720ab44 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) > } > > /** > - * ima_path_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement. > + * ima_file_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement. > * @file: pointer to the file to be measured > * @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC or MAY_APPEND > *
This is the [patch v2] based on your suggestion. Does this meet the requirements ?
| |