lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/1] of: unittest: overlay: ensure proper alignment of copied FDT
From
Date
On 4/8/21 4:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/8/21 2:28 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> Applying now so this gets into linux-next this week.
>>
> The patch doesn't apply on top of today's -next; it conflicts
> with "of: properly check for error returned by fdt_get_name()".
>
> I reverted that patch and applied this one, and the DT unittests
> run with it on openrisc. I do get a single test failure, but I that
> is a different problem (possibly with the test case itself).
>
> ### dt-test ### FAIL of_unittest_dma_ranges_one():923 of_dma_get_range: wrong DMA addr 0x00000000
> (expecting 100000000) on node /testcase-data/address-tests/bus@80000000/device@1000

That is a known regression on the target that I use for testing (and
has been since 5.10-rc1) - the 8074 dragonboard, arm 32. No
one else has reported it on the list, so even though I want to debug
and fix it "promptly", other tasks have had higher priority. In my
notes I list two suspect commits:

e0d072782c73 dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset
0a0f0d8be76d dma-mapping: split <linux/dma-mapping.h>

I think that was purely based on looking at the list of commits that
may have touched OF dma. I have not done a bisect.

One specific report of not seeing the FAIL was Vireshk on 5.11-rc6 with
a Hikey board.

>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Thanks for testing!

>
> Guenter
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-09 00:54    [W:0.060 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site