Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:02:57 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable |
| |
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:47:11PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > On 4/1/21 1:53 PM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> > Alternatively, I could just move the SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_graph_call..) to outside the ifdef.
> Or, even better, I could just use ftrace_call+4 because that would be the return > address for the tracer function at ftrace_call:
> I think that would be cleaner. And, I don't need the complicated comments for ftrace_graph_call.
> Is this acceptable?
I think either of those should be fine. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |