[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] CPU, NUMA topology ABIs: clarify the overflow issue of sysfs pagebuf
On 4/29/21 2:08 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>> Do we think >PAGE_SIZE data out of a sysfs file is a worse ABI break or
>> something?
> This kind of cpu list ABIs have been there for many years but have
> never been documented well.
> We have two ABIs:
> xxx_cpus - in format like 3333333333
> xxx_cpus_list - in format like 0,3,5,7,9,11,13....
> xxx_cpus_list is another human-readable version of xxx_cpus. It doesn't
> include any more useful information than xxx_cpus.
> xxx_cpus won't overflow based on BUILD_BUG_ON and maximum NR_CPUS
> in kconfig nowadays.
> if people all agree the trimmed list is a break of ABI, I think we may
> totally remove this list. For these days, this list probably has never
> overflowed but literally this could happen.
> thoughts?

From what Greg said, it sounds like removing the BUILD_BUG_ON(), making
it a binary sysfs file, and making it support arbitrary lengths is the
way to go.

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-29 23:39    [W:0.066 / U:6.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site