lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Is there a different memory allocation path other than the buddy allocator?
From
Date
On 28.04.21 09:37, Shivank Garg wrote:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I'm understanding memory allocation in Linux and doing some changes in
> buddy allocator (__alloc_pages_nodemask) for my experiments. I create
> a new flag in `struct page->flags` (by adding a new flag in `enum
> pageflags` in `page-flags.h`. I set this bit permanently in
> __alloc_pages_nodemask (to not to be cleared once set and survive all
> further allocation and freeing). But I'm not able to see expected
> behavior.
>
> I'm guessing this is because Linux is also using some different path
> to allocate memory (probably during boot). Is my hypothesis correct?
>
> Is there any different memory allocation path other than buddy
> allocator? Where can I find it?

memblock is the early memory allocator during boot, before the buddy is
up and running. The range allocator (e.g., alloc_contig_range()) is some
kind of mechanism that builds up on top of the buddy. Other allcoators
(hugetlb, slab, ...) might cache some pages, but effectively get
"physical memory" either via memblock or the buddy.

CMA is another special-purpose allocator which reserves physical memory
areas via memblock and then uses the range allocator to actually
allocate memory inside these reserved regions at runtime.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-28 16:45    [W:0.038 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site