Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:42:00 +0300 | From | Laurent Pinchart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 088/190] Revert "mmc_spi: add a status check for spi_sync_locked" |
| |
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:18:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:59:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This reverts commit 611025983b7976df0183390a63a2166411d177f1. > > > > > > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad > > > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known > > > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a > > > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy > > > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing > > > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University > > > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota). > > > > > > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from > > > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if > > > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this > > > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the > > > codebase. > > > > > > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > Thanks for the review! > > > I don't spot an obvious issue with the original patch though. > > Ulf did :)
I've replied separately, I still think it's not an issue :-)
-- Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
| |