[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [genirq] cbe16f35be: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -5.2% regression

On Tue, Apr 27 2021 at 17:00, kernel test robot wrote:

> Greeting,
> FYI, we noticed a -5.2% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to commit:
> commit: cbe16f35bee6880becca6f20d2ebf6b457148552 ("genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi()")
> master

this is the second report in the last week which makes not a lot of sense.
And this oneis makes absolutely no sense at all.

This commit affects request_irq() and the related variants and has
exactly ZERO influence on anything related to that test case simply

I seriously have to ask the question whether this test infrastructure is
actually measuring what it claims to measure.

As this commit clearly _cannot_ have the 'measured' side effect, this
points to some serious issue in the tests or the test infrastructure



 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-27 13:43    [W:0.075 / U:4.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site