lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: KASAN: null-ptr-deref Write in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll
From
Date


On 4/27/21 8:05 AM, Palash Oswal wrote:
>> +kernel lists and syzbot email
>> (almost nobody is reading syzkaller-bugs@ itself)
> Thanks Dmitry. I used "reply-all" in the google groups UI, and I
> didn't check the cc list before hitting send :/
>
> I have made progress on this bug. I applied a diff (to print some
> debug values) on the v5.12 fs/io_uring.c code and got a fairly
> consistent reproducer on a non-kvm based qemu VM (had to slow down the
> rate of syscalls processed for this to trigger early).
>
> My initial speculation was very wrong. And the real issue seems to be
> that current->io_uring is unset when io_uring_cancel_sqpoll is called.
>
> Adding the c reproducer here:
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
>
> #include <endian.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <time.h>
> #include <sys/wait.h>
>
> #define sys_io_uring_setup 425
> #define WAIT_FLAGS __WALL
>
> static unsigned long long procid;
>
> static void sleep_ms(uint64_t ms)
> {
> usleep(ms * 1000);
> }
>
>
> static void kill_and_wait(int pid, int* status)
> {
> kill(-pid, SIGKILL);
> kill(pid, SIGKILL);
> for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> if (waitpid(-1, status, WNOHANG | __WALL) == pid)
> return;
> usleep(1000);
> }
> while (waitpid(-1, status, __WALL) != pid) {
> }
> }
>
> static void execute_one(void) {
> *(uint32_t*)0x20000084 = 0x850e;
> *(uint32_t*)0x20000088 = 2;
> *(uint32_t*)0x2000008c = 2;
> *(uint32_t*)0x20000090 = 0x1b4;
> *(uint32_t*)0x20000098 = -1;
> memset((void*)0x2000009c, 0, 12);
> syscall(sys_io_uring_setup, 0x329b, 0x20000080);
> }
>
> static uint64_t current_time_ms(void)
> {
> struct timespec ts;
> if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts))
> exit(1);
> return (uint64_t)ts.tv_sec * 1000 + (uint64_t)ts.tv_nsec / 1000000;
> }
>
>
> static void loop(void)
> {
> int iter = 0;
> for (;; iter++) {
> int pid = fork();
> if (pid < 0)
> exit(1);
> if (pid == 0) {
> execute_one();
> exit(0);
> }
> int status = 0;
> uint64_t start = current_time_ms();
> for (;;) {
> if (waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG | WAIT_FLAGS) == pid)
> break;
> sleep_ms(1);
> kill_and_wait(pid, &status);
> break;
> }
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
> for (procid = 0; procid < 8; procid++) {
> if (fork() == 0) {
> loop();
> }
> }
> sleep(1000000);
> return 0;
> }
> Some debug console logs:
> [ 58.455071] ctx is 39386608
> [ 58.455415] io_uring_cancel_sqpoll called with ctx :39386080
> [ 58.455913] ctx->sq_data is 00000000c9f086d5
> [ 58.456146] current is 000000005e7bf8a0
> [ 58.456346] current->io_uring is :0000000000000000
> [ 58.457244] ==================================================================
> [ 58.457663] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x341/0x4b0
> [ 58.458214] Write of size 4 at addr 0000000000000060 by task
> iou-sqp-1857/1860
> [ 58.458699]
> [ 58.459061] CPU: 1 PID: 1860 Comm: iou-sqp-1857 Not tainted 5.12.0+ #83
> [ 58.459522] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
> [ 58.460065] Call Trace:
> [ 58.460402] dump_stack+0xe9/0x168
> [ 58.460749] ? io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x341/0x4b0
> [ 58.460846] __kasan_report+0x166/0x1c0
> [ 58.460846] ? io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x341/0x4b0
> [ 58.460846] kasan_report+0x4f/0x70
> [ 58.460846] kasan_check_range+0x2f3/0x340
> [ 58.460846] __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
> [ 58.460846] io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x341/0x4b0
> [ 58.460846] ? io_sq_thread_unpark+0xd0/0xd0
> [ 58.460846] ? init_wait_entry+0xe0/0xe0
> [ 58.460846] io_sq_thread+0x1a0d/0x1c50
> [ 58.460846] ? io_rsrc_put_work+0x380/0x380
> [ 58.460846] ? init_wait_entry+0xe0/0xe0
> [ 58.460846] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa5/0x180
> [ 58.460846] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x190/0x190
> [ 58.460846] ? calculate_sigpending+0x6b/0xa0
> [ 58.460846] ? io_rsrc_put_work+0x380/0x380
> [ 58.460846] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> I'm going to look further into why this is happening.

io_sq_offload_create() {
...
ret = io_uring_alloc_task_context(tsk, ctx);
wake_up_new_task(tsk);
if (ret)
goto err;
}

Shouldn't happen unless offload create has failed. Just add
a return in *cancel_sqpoll() for this case. It's failing
so no requests has been submitted and no cancellation is needed.

--
Pavel Begunkov

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-27 10:39    [W:0.078 / U:3.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site