lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/16] dma-direct: Support PCI P2PDMA pages in dma-direct map_sg
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:01:16AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Add PCI P2PDMA support for dma_direct_map_sg() so that it can map
> PCI P2PDMA pages directly without a hack in the callers. This allows
> for heterogeneous SGLs that contain both P2PDMA and regular pages.
>
> SGL segments that contain PCI bus addresses are marked with
> sg_mark_pci_p2pdma() and are ignored when unmapped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> kernel/dma/direct.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 002268262c9a..108dfb4ecbd5 100644
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/set_memory.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-p2pdma.h>
> #include "direct.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -387,19 +388,37 @@ void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i)
> + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
> + if (sg_is_pci_p2pdma(sg)) {
> + sg_unmark_pci_p2pdma(sg);

This doesn't seem nice, the DMA layer should only alter the DMA
portion of the SG, not the other portions. Is it necessary?

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-27 21:36    [W:0.530 / U:3.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site