Messages in this thread | | | From | "Shelat, Abhi" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg | Date | Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:58:08 +0000 |
| |
>> >>>> They introduce kernel bugs on purpose. Yesterday, I took a look on 4 >>>> accepted patches from Aditya and 3 of them added various severity security >>>> "holes". >>> >>> All contributions by this group of people need to be reverted, if they >>> have not been done so already, as what they are doing is intentional >>> malicious behavior and is not acceptable and totally unethical. I'll >>> look at it after lunch unless someone else wants to do it… >>
<snip>
Academic research should NOT waste the time of a community.
If you believe this behavior deserves an escalation, you can contact the Institutional Review Board (irb@umn.edu) at UMN to investigate whether this behavior was harmful; in particular, whether the research activity had an appropriate IRB review, and what safeguards prevent repeats in other communities.
All researchers at UMN must comply with their Human Research Protection Program Plan [1], and the UMN worksheet [2] to determine if a research activity needs IRB approval includes this question:
==== Will the investigator use, study, or analyze information or biospecimens obtained through either of the following mechanisms,? Specify which mechanism(s) apply, if yes: … Communication or interpersonal contact with the individuals. ("interaction”). ===
which I believe is true based on this thread.
[1] Human Research Protection Program Plan https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7644h9N2vLcV3FyMzJKYnJGeDA/view [2] Human Research Determination https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw4LRE9kGb69Mm5TbldxSVkwTms/view
| |