lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 9:27 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [Copy LKMM people, Josh, Nick and Wedson]
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:45:51PM +0200, ojeda@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > > Rust is a systems programming language that brings several key
> > > advantages over C in the context of the Linux kernel:
> > >
> > > - No undefined behavior in the safe subset (when unsafe code is
> > > sound), including memory safety and the absence of data races.
> >
> > And yet I see not a single mention of the Rust Memory Model and how it
> > aligns (or not) with the LKMM. The C11 memory model for example is a
> > really poor fit for LKMM.
> >
>
> I think Rust currently uses C11 memory model as per:
>
> https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/atomics.html
>
> , also I guess another reason that they pick C11 memory model is because
> LLVM has the support by default.
>
> But I think the Rust Community still wants to have a good memory model,
> and they are open to any kind of suggestion and input. I think we (LKMM
> people) should really get involved, because the recent discussion on
> RISC-V's atomics shows that if we didn't people might get a "broken"
> design because they thought C11 memory model is good enough:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YGyZPCxJYGOvqYZQ@boqun-archlinux/
>
> And the benefits are mutual: a) Linux Kernel Memory Model (LKMM) is
> defined by combining the requirements of developers and the behavior of
> hardwares, it's pratical and can be a very good input for memory model
> designing in Rust; b) Once Rust has a better memory model, the compiler
> technologies whatever Rust compilers use to suppor the memory model can
> be adopted to C compilers and we can get that part for free.

Yes, I agree; I think that's a very good approach. Avoiding the ISO
WG14 is interesting; at least the merits could be debated in the
public and not behind closed doors.

>
> At least I personally is very intereted to help Rust on a complete and
> pratical memory model ;-)
>
> Josh, I think it's good if we can connect to the people working on Rust
> memoryg model, I think the right person is Ralf Jung and the right place
> is https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines, but you
> cerntainly know better than me ;-) Or maybe we can use Rust-for-Linux or
> linux-toolchains list to discuss.
>
> [...]
> > > - Boqun Feng is working hard on the different options for
> > > threading abstractions and has reviewed most of the `sync` PRs.
> >
> > Boqun, I know you're familiar with LKMM, can you please talk about how
> > Rust does things and how it interacts?
>
> As Wedson said in the other email, currently there is no code requiring
> synchronization between C side and Rust side, so we are currently fine.
> But in the longer term, we need to teach Rust memory model about the
> "design patterns" used in Linux kernel for parallel programming.
>
> What I have been doing so far is reviewing patches which have memory
> orderings in Rust-for-Linux project, try to make sure we don't include
> memory ordering bugs for the beginning.
>
> Regards,
> Boqun



--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-16 08:07    [W:0.234 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site