lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 3/7] PCI: New Primary to Sideband (P2SB) bridge support library
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:20:16 +0200
> schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>:

...

> > + * pci_p2sb_bar - Get Primary to Sideband bridge (P2SB) device BAR
> > + * @pdev: PCI device to get a PCI bus to communicate with
> > + * @devfn: PCI slot and function to communicate with
> > + * @mem: memory resource to be filled in
>
> Do we really need that many arguments to it?
>
> Before i had, in a platform driver that never had its own pci_dev or bus
>
> res->start = simatic_ipc_get_membase0(PCI_DEVFN(13, 0));
> if (res-start == 0)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> So helper only asked for the devfn, returned base and no dedicated
> error code.
>
> With this i need
>
> struct pci_bus *bus = pci_find_bus(0, 0);
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = bus->self;
> unsigned int magic_i_do_not_want = PCI_DEVFN(13, 0);

What confuses me is the use for SPI NOR controller on Broxton. And I think
we actually can indeed hide all this under the hood by exposing P2SB to the OS.

Mika, what do you think?

> I guess that second devfn is for devices behind that bridge. So
> unhiding it might reveal several devices?

Good question. I need a device where actually this happens (hidden P2SB stuff
with let's say SPI NOR there) to see how it looks like in such case. I only
understood the GPIO part. But I'm not so sure anymore.

> But when caring about that
> p2sb do i really need to know its devfn. If so i would like to get

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-01 21:10    [W:0.204 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site