lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] RISC-V: correct enum sbi_ext_rfence_fid
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:55 AM Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:19 PM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:12 AM Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The constants in enum sbi_ext_rfence_fid should match the SBI
> > > > specification. See
> > > > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc#78-function-listing
> > > >
> > > > | Function Name | FID | EID
> > > > | sbi_remote_fence_i | 0 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_sfence_vma | 1 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid | 2 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_hfence_gvma_vmid | 3 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_hfence_gvma | 4 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_hfence_vvma_asid | 5 | 0x52464E43
> > > > | sbi_remote_hfence_vvma | 6 | 0x52464E43
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: ecbacc2a3efd ("RISC-V: Add SBI v0.2 extension definitions")
> > > > Reported-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> > >

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>

> > > Good catch.
> > >
> > > I guess we never saw any issues because these calls are only used by
> > > KVM RISC-V which is not merged yet. Further for KVM RISC-V, the HFENCE
> > > instruction is emulated as flush everything on FPGA, QEMU, and Spike so
> > > we did not notice any issue with KVM RISC-V too.
> > >
> >
> > OpenSBI & Xvisor also define the same order as Linux kernel. The
> > existing order(in Linux kernel)
> > makes more sense w.r.to Lexicographic order as well.
> >
> > Should we just fix the spec instead ?
>
> I would not recommend that because RFENCE is part of the released SBI v0.2 spec.
>

Fair enough.

> We have to be more careful in software to follow the spec correctly.
>

Agreed. Apologies for the slip up.

> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > > Looks good to me.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Anup
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > > index 99895d9c3bdd..d7027411dde8 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > > @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ enum sbi_ext_rfence_fid {
> > > > SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_FENCE_I = 0,
> > > > SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA,
> > > > SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID,
> > > > - SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA,
> > > > SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID,
> > > > - SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_VVMA,
> > > > + SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA,
> > > > SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID,
> > > > + SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_VVMA,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > enum sbi_ext_hsm_fid {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.30.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Atish



--
Regards,
Atish

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-09 20:30    [W:0.089 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site