lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:02 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 2, 2021, at 12:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there something like a uprobe test suite? How maintained /
> >> actively used is uprobe?
> >
> > uprobe+bpf is heavily used in production.
> > selftests/bpf has only one test for it though.
> >
> > Why are you asking?
>
> Because the integration with the x86 entry code is a mess, and I want to know whether to mark it BROKEN or how to make sure the any cleanups actually work.

Any test case to repro the issue you found?
Is it a bug or just messy code?
Nowadays a good chunk of popular applications (python, mysql, etc) has
USDTs in them.
Issues reported with bcc:
https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues?q=is%3Aissue+USDT
Similar thing with bpftrace.
Both standard USDT and semaphore based are used in the wild.
uprobe for containers has been a long standing feature request.
If you can improve uprobe performance that would be awesome.
That's another thing that people report often. We optimized it a bit.
More can be done.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-03 15:10    [W:0.103 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site