lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Testers wanted: Atom netbooks with x86_64 disabled by BIOS
W dniu 28.03.2021 o 00:25, Willy Tarreau pisze:
> FWIW I tested on my ASUS 1025C which runs on an Atom N2600 forced to
> 32-bit. I had already tried in the past but wanted to give it a try
> again in case I'd have missed anything. Sadly it didn't work, I'm
> still getting the "requires an x86-64 CPU" message.

Thank you. It looks like your bootloader uses the 16-bit kernel boot protocol.
The 16-bit kernel boot code checks for x86_64 presence with a similar message (
inside arch/x86/boot/cpu.c ), which I did not patch out. If you would like to
test again, use the same patched kernel, but change in GRUB: "linux16" to
"linux" and "initrd16" to "initrd" to use the 32-bit boot protocol. Which
distribution and bootloader do you use?

W dniu 28.03.2021 o 03:07, Thomas Gleixner pisze:
> There are some of these '32bit only' CPUs out there in the wild which
> actually support long mode. Some of them even do not have the long mode
> CPUID bit fused out. But whether it works is a different story:
>
>   - If the CPUID bit is on, then the chance is high, but it runs out of
>     spec (guarantee wise)
>
>   - If it's off is still might work by some definition of work as they
>     might have fused off more or there are actual defects in some 64bit
>     only area which are irrelevant when in 32bit mode.

Of course, force enabling x86_64 would require passing a kernel command line
parameter with a prominent warning in documentation, just like with "forcepae".

Greetings,
Mateusz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-28 14:39    [W:0.094 / U:1.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site